Who Is Barack Obama?

Few Americans have the slightest idea who Barack Obama really is, what he really stands for...or how he actually got where he is today.
Home
Contact Us
Something To Think About
Reasons to NOT Vote for O
Eligibility For President
Good Points
Obama Lies
Race
Abortion
Gay Rights
Terrorism
Homeland Security
Guns
Immigration
Taxes
War
Religion
Energy
Economy
Current News
Liberal Agenda
Obama's Family
Rev. Jeremiah Wright
Tony Rezko
William Ayers
ACORN
Other Relationships
Obama Quotes
Visitor Comments
Receive e-mail Updates
What You Can Do To Help
Links
About that 'civilian national security force'

Posted: September 08, 2008
1:00 am Eastern

© 2008 

The pieces are coming together.

 

We're getting a more complete picture of Barack Obama's draconian plans to create a domestic army of radical extremists promoting bigger and more intrusive government.

 

The plan is to create a boot camp for community agitators – paid for by you, the U.S. taxpayer.

Investor's Business Daily deserves credit for putting together the elaborate jigsaw puzzle. I merely saw the smoke. IBD discovered the fire. But for reference, you will want to read about what I found previously regarding Obama's calls for a "civilian national security force."

 

It seems Obama was a founding member of a group called Public Allies in 1992. In 1993, he resigned before his wife, Michelle, took over as executive director of the Chicago chapter.

 

This little-known, but well-funded, band of taxpayer-supported social misfits will, according to IBD, serve as the centerpiece of his "Universal Voluntary Public Service" program.

 

"Universal voluntary?" Isn't that an oxymoron? Yes, but just consider the moron who is advocating it.

"Big Brother had nothing on the Obamas," write the editorialists for IBD. "They plan to herd American youth into government-funded re-education camps where they'll be brainwashed into thinking America is a racist, oppressive place in need of 'social change.'"

 

The "Obama Youth" will get a monthly stipend of $1,800, plus paid health and child care, plus a $4,725 grant after their "service" for future education or school loan payoffs.

 

But this isn't just a make-work program.

 

IBD says the "real mission is to radicalize American youth and use them to bring about 'social change' through threats, pressure, tension and confrontation – the tactics used by the father of community organizing, Saul 'The Red' Alinsky."

 

The group boasts that graduates of the program are more than twice as likely as other young people to "engage in protest activities." Isn't that wonderful? That's the real purpose – using your tax dollars to foment extremist political clashes, furthering the reach of Big Government into the lives of all of us.

 

The government already pays about half the bill for Public Allies through Bill Clinton's AmeriCorps program. Obama seeks to fund it at levels equal to the U.S. Defense Department – close to $500 billion annually.

This is what he meant when he said: "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as the military."

 

IBD concludes: "The gall of it: The Obamas want to create a boot camp for radicals who hate the military – and stick American taxpayers with the bill."

 

What else is there to say?

 

Such a program would fundamentally change the character of America – possibly forever.

Someone should ask Obama, who claims to be a legal scholar, where he finds such a program authorized among the enumerated powers of the Constitution.

 

Now that would be an entertaining question and answer for some intrepid member of the press.

Personally, I won't hold my breath waiting for anyone with access to be so bold.

 

Remember what programs like this are about. They are about empowering government to take more control over your life. They are about limiting your freedom. They are about picking your pocket. They are about changing the way you think by coercion. They are about making you uncomfortable being an American. They are about total power – and never letting go.

 

We've seen programs like this before – in Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, Stalin's Soviet Union and Mao's China.

 

Never again.

 

 

Does Barack Hussein Obama want to SILENCE RUSH?

His campaign now says he doesn't support the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" (a measure that liberals are trying to impose to get rid of the only medium that gives equal time to conservative thoughts and opinions; namely, conservative talk radio) -- athough he supported it several months ago.

Michael Ortiz, the Obama campaign's press secretary, told Broadcasting and Cable:
"Senator Obama does not support re-imposing the Fairness Doctrine on broadcasters."
But what many liberal media outlets are not reporting is THE REST OF ORTIZ'S STATEMENT!
Ortiz continued:

"He considers this debate to be a distraction from the conversation we should be having about opening up the airwaves and modern communications to as many diverse viewpoints as possible. That is why Sen. Obama supports media-ownership caps, network neutrality, public broadcasting, as well as increasing minority ownership of broadcasting and print outlets."

Forget about those short-sighted liberal plots to silence Rush Limbaugh and all those other pesky conservative talk-radio hosts.  Obama has a bigger vision!

 "Media Ownership Caps... ?"  Ortiz's statement is very clear!  Obama wants the whole enchilada!  Essentially Ortiz is saying that the federal government should control and regulate exactly who owns a media outlet. 

 "[I]ncreasing Minority Ownership of Broadcast And Print Outlets... ?" Not enough minority owned stations?  Not a problem? The government can fix that too!  Let's extend Affirmative-Action to the airwaves.  Maybe the Rev. Jeremiah Wright will get his own show.  He can call it; "The God D___ American Hour."

 "Diverse Viewpoints... ?"  With the exception of talk-radio and FOX News , the Left already has a broadcast and print monopoly.  Is Ortiz possible saying that we need the government to enforce the dissemination of MORE conservative thoughts and opinions on the airwaves?  Doubtful!

It appears that Obama is ONLY against the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" because he really wants to impose an UBER-FAIRNESS DOCTRINE!

And that's NOT good news for any American who values free speech!

There is a fix.  Congressman Mike Pence has proposed legislation, The Broadcaster Freedom Act (HR 2905), which would thwart future efforts to bring back the so-called "Fairness Doctrine."
And IF it could get a vote in the House of Representatives, IT WOULD PASS!

But Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi -- in what is becoming an all too typical maneuver -- is REFUSING TO BRING THE BROADCASTER FREEDOM ACT TO THE FLOOR FOR A FAIR UP-OR-DOWN VOTE!

Don't let Barack Hussein Obama, or Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid legislate a monopoly of liberal thought on the airwaves.  Use this hyperlink or the button below to send 27 FAXES to President George W. Bush and EACH and EVERY Member of the Leadership of  the United States House of Representatives.

Tell them that the American people should be free to decide whether they want to listen to Rush Limbaugh, or Sean Hannity or Laura Ingraham. We do not live in the former Soviet Union and liberals in Congress have no right to decide what the American people should or should not hear!

Demand that they bring Congressman Mike Pence's Broadcaster Freedom Act -- which is specifically designed to STOP the imposition of the so-called Fairness Doctrine -- to the floor for a fair up-or-down vote.  The American people need to know which Members of Congress value the First Amendment!
 
 
 

This is a very interesting comparison on their responses to issues....

2008 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE COMPARISON TALKING POINTS

ISSUE

JOHN McCAIN

BARACK OBAMA

Favors new drilling offshore US

Yes

No

Will appoint judges who interpret the law not make it

Yes

No

Served in the US Armed Forces

Yes

No

Amount of time served in the US Senate

22 YEARS

173 DAYS

Will institute a socialized national health care plan

No

Yes

Supports abortion throughout the pregnancy

No

Yes

Would pull troops out of Iraq immediately

No

Yes

Supports gun ownership rights

Yes

No

Supports homosexual marriage

No

Yes

Proposed programs will mean a huge tax increase

No

Yes

Voted against making English the official language

No

Yes

Voted to give Social Security benefits to illegals

No

Yes

CAPITAL GAINS TAX

MCCAIN

0% on home sales up to $500,000 per home (couples). McCain does not propose any change in existing home sales income tax.

OBAMA

28% on profit from ALL home sales.  (How does this affect you? If you sell your home and make a profit, you will pay 28% of your gain on taxes. If you are heading toward retirement and would like to down-size your home or move into a retirement community, 28% of the money you make from your home will go to taxes. This proposal will adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income from their homes as part of their retirement income.)

DIVIDEND TAX

MCCAIN

15% (no change)

OBAMA

39.6% - (How will this affect you? If you have any money invested in stock market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance, retirement accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests dividends, you will now be paying nearly 40% of the money earned on taxes if Obama becomes president. The experts predict that 'Higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains would crash the stock market, yet do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.')

INCOME TAX

MCCAIN

(no changes)

Single making 30K - tax $4,500
Single making 50K - tax $12,500
Single making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 60K- tax $9,000
Married making 75K - tax $18,750
Married making 125K - tax $31,250

OBAMA

(reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)

Single making 30K - tax $8,400
Single making 50K - tax $14,000
Single making 75K - tax $23,250
Married making 60K - tax $16,800
Married making 75K - tax $21,000
Married making 125K - tax $38,750
Under Obama, your taxes could almost double!

INHERITANCE TAX

MCCAIN

- 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)

OBAMA

Restore the inheritance tax

Many families have lost businesses, farms, ranches, and homes that have been in their families for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will only lose them to these taxes.

NEW TAXES PROPOSED BY OBAMA

New government taxes proposed on homes that are more than 2400 square feet.  New gasoline taxes (as if gas weren't high enough already) New taxes on natural resources consumption (heating gas, water, electricity)  New taxes on retirement accounts, and last but not least....New taxes to pay for socialized medicine so we can receive the same level of medical care as other third-world countries!!!

 
 
 
 


You can verify the above at the following web sites
:


http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/election/2008/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.taxes.html

http://elections.foxnews.com/?s=proposed+taxes

http://bulletin.aarp.org/yourworld/politics/articles/mccain_obama_offer_different_visions_on_taxes.html 

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/candidates/barack_obama/

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/candidates/john_mccain/